Posts Tagged ‘explosive growth’

 

Three top VC’s weigh in: Free to play the way to go

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Wagner James Au from Gigaom recently talked with three top VC’s about the gaming industry.  His goal?  To find out what the people with the money are looking at, and where this rapidly changing economy is headed.

The quick and dirty shakes out like so: Free or alternate funded games (i.e. microtransactions, in game advertisement, etc.) are poised for explosive growth, and a top-to-bottom transformation of how games are played, developed, and deployed.  One VC in particular takes an alternate look at the casual gaming market and predicts an imminent backlash.

Mitch Lasky of Benchmark Capital (Second Life, Gaia Online, Red 5, Vivox, Riot Games and JAMDAT) says in an email to Wagner, “I’m sensing that we are on the verge of a casual games backlash.  The space is so ridiculously over-funded, the barriers to entry are so low, and the media models require such high traffic to generate meaningful revenue, that I think there has to be a shake-out. I think the sites with traffic, like MiniClip, will benefit, because everybody is going to be buying referrals from them.”

While Lasky gives credit where credit is due, he also sees top beneficiaries of the non-casual gaming market as middlemare producers.  “I read a recent analyst report that showed almost 90 MMO’s, virtual worlds and online game services scheduled to come to market in the next 18 months,” he said. All that activity is “going to benefit the platform companies — we’ve been seeing tremendous customer growth at Vivox, for example, which provides high quality voice services to online games.”

Speaking to non-casual games, Lasky also added, “I’m increasingly interested in more gamer-oriented online games, not based on subscription billing models. Our investment in Riot Games grew out of this thinking. We’ve seen strong evidence that this combination works in the Chinese and Korean markets, but it’s been slow to take off here. It is going to take the right game to unlock this market, but it could be huge.”

Lightspeed Venture Partners Managing Director Jeremy Liew confirms Lasky’s opinion about the rise of free-to-play.  He’s predicting a massive shift away from the subscription model, echoing developments in Asia.

“Free-to-play gaming and virtual worlds (monetized through up-sold virtual goods and subscriptions) are gaining increasing traction in the West,” he said in an email. “Companies like K2, Nexon, Gaia, Habbo, Neopets, Runescape/Jagex, Gameforge, Eve/CCP and Bigpoint all doing revenues now in the tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars. But gaming, like media, is not a winner-take-all business, and there are many up and coming companies building free to play experiences and growing fast.”

In Liew’s view, companies that can help with player acquisition, billing, fraud and player management/game mastering are those poised to profit the most.

Liew’s not only in his thinking, as Susan Wu a former VC at Charles River Ventures agrees.  “With the death of retail and the greater accessibility of games in the hands of an order of magnitude larger audience, free to play with some premium components becomes the most logical conclusion. Then of course with alternate billing models comes alternate payment systems.”

Wu is now in the drivers seat at what she terms “a groundbreaking, stealthy new online gaming company.”   While Wu’s no newcomer to the party, she sites Susan Choe’s Outspark, Acclaim, and Nabeel Hyatt’s Conduit Labs (Loud Croud) as projects she’s followed closely, and sees them as integral parts of a netwide transformation.

While Wu notes that the web has always been changing, she’s quite surprised at the rapid pace of change, particularly accelerated by the acceptance of social networks as entertainment platforms.

In addition to this acceptance, technological innovations and game development abilities have jumpstarted this change.  With flash becoming a viable platform for games (think iPhone), and even industry giant Blizzard producing hardcore games (and likewise devoted followers) despite super flashy graphics.  Wu also takes a step back to view a psychological factor as game industry driver.  “With social relationships as primary catalysts for game playing; we’re moving back to the playground where games reinforce and create social bonds.”

So while one VC sees an impending backlash verging on the horizon, all three separately agree that the age of subscription is a dying breed, with free to play titles gaining more and more ground each day.  As Lasky points out, with over 90 MMO’s, virtual worlds, and online game services coming to market within the next 18 months, this is bound to become an increasingly competitive space.  Bringing the product to market quickly and effectively may be the winning strategy for developers.  Wouldn’t it be a shame for them to have a great title, but be weighed down by their own development of primary and secondary economies?  Enter stage right…..fatfoogoo.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
 

Guide to Total Economic Return from Virtual Worlds Applications

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

Strategy Analytics recently released a new study titled, “Defining the Total Economic Return from Virtual Worlds Applications”.  This guide is mean to serve as a better informed roadmap for companies planning their virtual world investments in order to receive larger returns.

“Virtual Worlds have witnessed considerable growth among consumers, but companies have lacked the economic justification, metrics, and process to guide investments,” said Harvey Cohen, President of Strategy Analytics and chief architect of the study, while adding, “Virtual worlds can serve as a strategic catalyst for penetrating youthful markets as well as a checkpoint for demonstrating a company’s focus on innovation.”

Strategy Analytics estimates that there were 46m virtual world users in 2006, 90m in 2007, and projects 137m this year.  Keeping this growth rate in mind, that would place over 1 Billion virtual world users in 10 years time.  Granted, 10 year out projections can be a bit tricky, the general industry wide consensus shows now sign of hindering this explosive growth.  With the average consumer website engagement lasting only a few minutes, the average virtual world experience tend to be 45-50 minutes in duration.

“Companies will require more specific measurement tools in order to continue their investments in virtual worlds,” commented Barry Gilbert, Vice President and Research Director of the Strategy Analytics Virtual World Strategies program. “Multi-billion dollar global brand companies looking to target the global youth market should be investing a minimum of one percent of their advertising and promotional budget in virtual worlds.”

The downside of the report finds:

This report finds that many companies have found that investments in virtual worlds have not met expectations. Their problems begin with poorly implemented media strategies that do not include virtual worlds as part of an integrated PR and promotional effort, and end with a lack of understanding of the appropriate metrics for assessing economic impact. [...]

While companies can access virtual worlds with a small development investment, they often find that building and sustaining consumer momentum requires an on-going budget of at least 60% of their initial investment.

Strategy Analytics is quick to point out that the traditional ‘build it and they will come’ approach has been many top brands downfall.  Unfortunately, the virtual world landscape is littered with grandiose building (marketing) projects that have simply been set up, with little to no engagement and/or follow through from these brands.